LGOIMA Requests
Refine Search
Search results: 675
| Received | Subject | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19/02/2026 | Complaints received about requesters property on Makino Road over last 12 months | Complete | Details |
| 19/02/2026 | Information about Stormwater/Road Drains on Ulysses Road | Complete | Details |
| 19/02/2026 | Request for full property and rates database | Complete | Details |
| 13/02/2026 | A list of payments made by the Council to consultancy/advisory firms (including subsidiaries) on behalf of mana whenua/Māori, and copies of any agreements/contracts and invoices | Complete | Details |
| 02/02/2026 | Number of consents issued under District Plan rules (Separation of Residential Units Along Roads) in the past three years and how many were actually waived without the imposition of a fee | Withdrawn | Details |
| 02/02/2026 | Enquiry about decision to apply penalties to rates accounts for two Sheddan Road addresses | With Ombudsman | Details |
| 29/01/2026 | Information on Council employee and request for document | Complete | Details |
| 28/01/2026 | Information about unpaid rates, cost recovery and council interactions with public | Complete | Details |
| 28/01/2026 | Parking warden query and council resolution for parking limits | Complete | Details |
| 27/01/2026 | All correspondence 01/25 to 02/26 regarding subdivision at Gilbert Street | Complete | Details |
LGOIMA Request Details: LG2433
Date received: 19/02/2026
Requested information: Complaints received about requesters property on Makino Road over last 12 months
Status: Complete
Response:
Please find the information you have requested in this link – withheld due to privacy
The document has been redacted under section 7(2)(a) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act, to protect the privacy of an individual.
LGOIMA Request Details: LG2434
Date received: 19/02/2026
Requested information: Information about Stormwater/Road Drains on Ulysses Road
Status: Complete
LGOIMA Request Details: LG2435
Date received: 19/02/2026
Requested information: Request for full property and rates database
Status: Complete
Response:
The property and valuation information you have requested (property address, unique property ID, capital value, land value, land area and rating category) is publicly available through the Council website - Rates Property Search | Manawatū District Council. The valuation information is based on the 2022 revaluation, which is the operative valuation for the 2025/26 rating year. These assessed amounts are made publicly available to support transparency of rating information.
You have asked for a breakdown of the individual rating components that make up rates for each property (i.e. general rate, uniform annual general charge, water supply, wastewater, stormwater and the individual Horizons Regional Council rates). Council does not hold this information in a property-level dataset or in the format requested, nor do we hold any Horizons Regional Council rating information. Producing a per-property breakdown of each individual rating component would require creating new information, which Council is not obliged to do under the LGOIMA.
The individual rating components adopted for the 2025/26 rating year are however publicly available in our Annual Plan - MDC-Annual-Plan-2025_Final-260625.pdf.
You also requested the total rates paid to MDC and HRC, and the
amounts paid by each individual rate. However, under section
30 of the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002, information relating to
rates payments, instalment status, arrears and other account-specific
details may only be released to the individual ratepayer or their authorised
agent. As releasing this information would be contrary
to the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002, this part of your request
is refused under section 17 (c)(i) of the LGOIMA.
Again, MDC does not hold any HRC information.
LGOIMA Request Details: LG2431
Date received: 13/02/2026
Requested information: A list of payments made by the Council to consultancy/advisory firms (including subsidiaries) on behalf of mana whenua/Māori, and copies of any agreements/contracts and invoices
Status: Complete
Response:
Manawatū District Council has made no payments to consultancy/advisory firms on behalf of mana whenua/Māori over that period. Accordingly, there is no information to provide in response to parts (a), (b) or (c) of your request.
23 February 2026
Just to clarify for this request.
LGOIMA Request Details: LG2429
Date received: 02/02/2026
Requested information: Number of consents issued under District Plan rules (Separation of Residential Units Along Roads) in the past three years and how many were actually waived without the imposition of a fee
Status: Withdrawn
LGOIMA Request Details: LG2430
Date received: 02/02/2026
Requested information: Enquiry about decision to apply penalties to rates accounts for two Sheddan Road addresses
Status: With Ombudsman
LGOIMA Request Details: LG2427
Date received: 29/01/2026
Requested information: Information on Council employee and request for document
Status: Complete
Response:
Your request is set out below, followed by Council’s response to each item. Any documents referred to below are contained in this link - Withheld under section 7(2)(a) of the LGOIMA - to preserve an individuals privacy.
1. I request the name of the female officer from the Manawatu District Council who entered onto our property and confirmation that she is an employee of MDC.
The site inspection at *** Pharazyn Road, Feilding was undertaken by Joy Ma, Building Officer, acting on behalf of Manawatū District Council in relation to a recently lodged building consent application.
At the time of the inspection:
The purpose of the visit was to identify the siting of the building, which is a standard part of Council’s process for new and relocated dwellings.
Upon arrival, the Building Officer met briefly with a woman on site, introduced herself, and explained that Council had recently received a building consent application and that photographs were required to confirm the building’s location.
During this brief interaction, the Building Officer formed the understanding that there was no objection to proceeding with the site inspection.
The Building Officer then took photographs of the site and left the property without further interaction.
Council notes that the majority of site inspections are undertaken on vacant sites, and it is standard practice for Building Officers to attend such inspections without owners or agents present. Where an owner or agent is on site, officers are required to identify themselves and explain the purpose of their visit, and to produce their warrant of appointment if requested.
All photographs taken during this inspection are contained within the site visit report, which is provided in response to your request.
2. If this woman is an employee of MDC I request copies of all photo images taken by this person.
The photographs taken during the site inspection at *** Pharazyn Road, Feilding are contained within the site visit report.
Please refer to the attached site visit report, which includes all photographs taken by the Building Officer acting on behalf of Manawatū District Council at the time of the inspection.
3. In an email from Madi Williams to Central House Movers she states “on the plan this is labelled as a dwelling if so, will this be the second dwelling on this property”? Can I please have a copy of the plan Madi is referring to.
The plan referred to in the email from Ms Madi Williams is contained within the building consent application lodged with Manawatū District Council on 7 April 2005.
Please refer to the attached building consent application and associated plans submitted on 7 April 2005, which identify a dwelling on the site.
Subsequently, Council received a new building consent application for the property. The plans submitted with the new application identified the building as a sleepout, which differed from the earlier plans held on Council’s records.
As part of the processing of the new application, Council’s Planning team reviewed the historical consent information and noted the inconsistency between the earlier plans and the current proposal. To clarify this matter, Council’s Planning Officer contacted Central House Movers to confirm whether the proposed building would result in a second dwelling on the property.
This was discussed during a phone call between Council’s Planning Officer and Central House Movers on Wednesday 28 January, during which it was confirmed that the reference to a dwelling related to a previously submitted plan, and that the current application related to a sleepout.
LGOIMA Request Details: LG2428
Date received: 28/01/2026
Requested information: Information about unpaid rates, cost recovery and council interactions with public
Status: Complete
Response:
The information you requested is below;
1) The number of personal grievances or formal complaints relating to
disputes with the public over council rules or statutory obligations, and any
high-level reports or summaries about trends or impacts of these disputes on
staff or council operations.
Manawatu District Council (MDC) has not had any issues in this regard.
2) The number of cases where people have disputed or delayed paying rates,
fees, or charges, or refused to comply with council requirements (for example,
dog registration), and any summaries or reports describing the nature or volume
of these disputes.
MDC has had two such cases identified during the relevant period.
- One individual disputed Council rates and dog registration requirements but has since paid the outstanding amounts.
- A second individual is currently in dispute regarding payment of their rates.
No formal summaries or reports have been prepared regarding the nature
or volume of these disputes, as the number of cases is minimal.
3) Total costs, including legal fees, court or debt recovery costs, or extra
staff time, related to handling the above disputes, and any reports or
summaries assessing the impact on council resources or finances.
The total direct costs incurred to date are $2,274.09. This amount
relates solely to debt recovery expenses.
The work associated with these matters has been undertaken as part of normal
business-as-usual (BAU) activities. Accordingly, no additional staff time or
internal administrative costs have been separately recorded.
No reports or summaries have been prepared assessing the impact on Council
resources or finances, as the number of cases is minimal.
4) The number of LGOIMA requests received that relate to disputes over
council rules, charges, or enforcement, and any internal summaries or reports
about high-volume requests or the impact of repeated requests on staff and
operations.
NIL meeting these criteria.
We have received numerous documents from sovereign citizen groups, however they
are not addressed only to our council. The documents are global in focus and do
not apply to our regulatory framework.
LGOIMA Request Details: LG2425
Date received: 28/01/2026
Requested information: Parking warden query and council resolution for parking limits
Status: Complete
Response:
The information you have requested is below and within this link – LG2425Documents.zip
- The full name of MDC1 who I understand is a Parking
Warden.
Chris McRae
- Evidence of MDC1’s appointment as a Parking Warden
under Section 128D of the Land Transport Act 1998
Please see the link above for a copy of the officer’s warrant issued under Section 128D of the Land Transport Act 1998
- A copy of Council’s original resolution imposing
a 60 minute limit for parked vehicles along part of Kimbolton
Road.
Please see the link above
LGOIMA Request Details: LG2424
Date received: 27/01/2026
Requested information: All correspondence 01/25 to 02/26 regarding subdivision at Gilbert Street
Status: Complete
Response:
Please find in this link, the documents as requested between 1 January 2025 and 1 February 2026. I have also included all documents received as part of the original application.
The documentation represents our best efforts to locate material relevant to your request. While we have conducted a thorough search based on the information available, there remains a possibility that some relevant information may not have been identified.