LGOIMA Requests
Refine Search
Search results: 669
| Received | Subject | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 29/01/2026 | Information on Council employee and request for document | Complete | Details |
| 28/01/2026 | Information about unpaid rates, cost recovery and council interactions with public | Complete | Details |
| 28/01/2026 | Parking warden query and council resolution for parking limits | Complete | Details |
| 27/01/2026 | All correspondence 01/25 to 02/26 regarding subdivision at Gilbert Street | Complete | Details |
| 26/01/2026 | Information about Council Art and Budget for art | Complete | Details |
| 24/01/2026 | Information and correspondence about grave sites in Fielding Cemetery | Complete | Details |
| 23/01/2026 | Information around dog being picked up CCR 94036 | Complete | Details |
| 21/01/2026 | Rating information for financial years 2024/25 and 2025/26 | Complete | Details |
| 21/01/2026 | Information on staffing, third party payments and the Audit & Risk Committee | Complete | Details |
| 21/01/2026 | Information on Contractors and Consultants, depreciation and Mayors budget for 2024/25 financial year | Complete | Details |
LGOIMA Request Details: LG2427
Date received: 29/01/2026
Requested information: Information on Council employee and request for document
Status: Complete
Response:
Your request is set out below, followed by Council’s response to each item. Any documents referred to below are contained in this link - Withheld under section 7(2)(a) of the LGOIMA - to preserve an individuals privacy.
1. I request the name of the female officer from the Manawatu District Council who entered onto our property and confirmation that she is an employee of MDC.
The site inspection at *** Pharazyn Road, Feilding was undertaken by Joy Ma, Building Officer, acting on behalf of Manawatū District Council in relation to a recently lodged building consent application.
At the time of the inspection:
The purpose of the visit was to identify the siting of the building, which is a standard part of Council’s process for new and relocated dwellings.
Upon arrival, the Building Officer met briefly with a woman on site, introduced herself, and explained that Council had recently received a building consent application and that photographs were required to confirm the building’s location.
During this brief interaction, the Building Officer formed the understanding that there was no objection to proceeding with the site inspection.
The Building Officer then took photographs of the site and left the property without further interaction.
Council notes that the majority of site inspections are undertaken on vacant sites, and it is standard practice for Building Officers to attend such inspections without owners or agents present. Where an owner or agent is on site, officers are required to identify themselves and explain the purpose of their visit, and to produce their warrant of appointment if requested.
All photographs taken during this inspection are contained within the site visit report, which is provided in response to your request.
2. If this woman is an employee of MDC I request copies of all photo images taken by this person.
The photographs taken during the site inspection at *** Pharazyn Road, Feilding are contained within the site visit report.
Please refer to the attached site visit report, which includes all photographs taken by the Building Officer acting on behalf of Manawatū District Council at the time of the inspection.
3. In an email from Madi Williams to Central House Movers she states “on the plan this is labelled as a dwelling if so, will this be the second dwelling on this property”? Can I please have a copy of the plan Madi is referring to.
The plan referred to in the email from Ms Madi Williams is contained within the building consent application lodged with Manawatū District Council on 7 April 2005.
Please refer to the attached building consent application and associated plans submitted on 7 April 2005, which identify a dwelling on the site.
Subsequently, Council received a new building consent application for the property. The plans submitted with the new application identified the building as a sleepout, which differed from the earlier plans held on Council’s records.
As part of the processing of the new application, Council’s Planning team reviewed the historical consent information and noted the inconsistency between the earlier plans and the current proposal. To clarify this matter, Council’s Planning Officer contacted Central House Movers to confirm whether the proposed building would result in a second dwelling on the property.
This was discussed during a phone call between Council’s Planning Officer and Central House Movers on Wednesday 28 January, during which it was confirmed that the reference to a dwelling related to a previously submitted plan, and that the current application related to a sleepout.
LGOIMA Request Details: LG2428
Date received: 28/01/2026
Requested information: Information about unpaid rates, cost recovery and council interactions with public
Status: Complete
Response:
The information you requested is below;
1) The number of personal grievances or formal complaints relating to
disputes with the public over council rules or statutory obligations, and any
high-level reports or summaries about trends or impacts of these disputes on
staff or council operations.
Manawatu District Council (MDC) has not had any issues in this regard.
2) The number of cases where people have disputed or delayed paying rates,
fees, or charges, or refused to comply with council requirements (for example,
dog registration), and any summaries or reports describing the nature or volume
of these disputes.
MDC has had two such cases identified during the relevant period.
- One individual disputed Council rates and dog registration requirements but has since paid the outstanding amounts.
- A second individual is currently in dispute regarding payment of their rates.
No formal summaries or reports have been prepared regarding the nature
or volume of these disputes, as the number of cases is minimal.
3) Total costs, including legal fees, court or debt recovery costs, or extra
staff time, related to handling the above disputes, and any reports or
summaries assessing the impact on council resources or finances.
The total direct costs incurred to date are $2,274.09. This amount
relates solely to debt recovery expenses.
The work associated with these matters has been undertaken as part of normal
business-as-usual (BAU) activities. Accordingly, no additional staff time or
internal administrative costs have been separately recorded.
No reports or summaries have been prepared assessing the impact on Council
resources or finances, as the number of cases is minimal.
4) The number of LGOIMA requests received that relate to disputes over
council rules, charges, or enforcement, and any internal summaries or reports
about high-volume requests or the impact of repeated requests on staff and
operations.
NIL meeting these criteria.
We have received numerous documents from sovereign citizen groups, however they
are not addressed only to our council. The documents are global in focus and do
not apply to our regulatory framework.
LGOIMA Request Details: LG2425
Date received: 28/01/2026
Requested information: Parking warden query and council resolution for parking limits
Status: Complete
Response:
The information you have requested is below and within this link – LG2425Documents.zip
- The full name of MDC1 who I understand is a Parking
Warden.
Chris McRae
- Evidence of MDC1’s appointment as a Parking Warden
under Section 128D of the Land Transport Act 1998
Please see the link above for a copy of the officer’s warrant issued under Section 128D of the Land Transport Act 1998
- A copy of Council’s original resolution imposing
a 60 minute limit for parked vehicles along part of Kimbolton
Road.
Please see the link above
LGOIMA Request Details: LG2424
Date received: 27/01/2026
Requested information: All correspondence 01/25 to 02/26 regarding subdivision at Gilbert Street
Status: Complete
Response:
Please find in this link, the documents as requested between 1 January 2025 and 1 February 2026. I have also included all documents received as part of the original application.
The documentation represents our best efforts to locate material relevant to your request. While we have conducted a thorough search based on the information available, there remains a possibility that some relevant information may not have been identified.
LGOIMA Request Details: LG2423
Date received: 26/01/2026
Requested information: Information about Council Art and Budget for art
Status: Complete
Response:
Thank you for your request regarding Manawatū District Council’s art collection and associated budget.
Please find our response to each part of your request below. We have included the Manawatū Community Hub Library (MCHL), Makino Pool and Community Murals in our response:
A full breakdown of your art collection
- One small triptych artwork, displayed in the Executive Wing foyer, value $850.00
- Drover & Dog Statue, installed on Kimbolton Road, donated, reinstatement value $203,000.00
- Squabbling Birds statue, on display outside MCHL, donated, value unknown.
- 3 paintings by the original owner of Mt Lees Homestead, installed at Mt Lees Homestead for public viewing, donated, value unknown
- 2 paintings by Sarah Platt, installed in Library for public viewing, donated, value unknown
- 2x 130 yr old New Zealand maps, on display at MCHL – Tui Mayo Room, found in the archives, value unknown
- Community Murals, on display throughout the district, painted by Joe McMenamin
- Makino Back Carpark, $4,300.00
- Makino Water Tank, $7,250.00
- Turners Road Reservoir, $17,000.00
- McDonald Heights Water Tank, $1,300 (the paint was donated and grant from Creative Communities covered the rest)
- Māori carving, on display at MDC Reception, received as an Environmental Award, value unknown
- Māori Carving on display at MCHL, a part of the cultural design of the building, value unknown
The number of roles that involve working with your art collection
Council does not have any roles specifically allocated to managing or working with an art collection.
- Number of dedicated roles: 0
- Job titles: Not applicable
- Salary or salary bands: Not applicable
How much is allocated in your yearly budget to be spent on art?
Council does not have a dedicated annual budget allocation for the acquisition of artwork. Where artwork has been incorporated into Council projects (for example, murals), funding has been sourced through project budgets and/or external grants or funding.
In summary, Manawatū District Council is a small Council and the artworks within Council ownership or care have primarily been donated, incorporated within broader capital project budgets or identified within historical archives.
LGOIMA Request Details: LG2426
Date received: 24/01/2026
Requested information: Information and correspondence about grave sites in Fielding Cemetery
Status: Complete
Response:
LG 2426 – Information and correspondence about grave sites in Feilding Cemetery
In response to your information request, the following documents are contained in this link - Withheld due to privacyLGOIMA Request Details: LG2422
Date received: 23/01/2026
Requested information: Information around dog being picked up CCR 94036
Status: Complete
Response:
Thank you for your request under the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (LGOIMA).
All information within scope of your request is attached.
Please note some information has been withheld/redacted to protect personal privacy, in accordance with section 7(2)(a) of the LGOIMA.
Attachments:
LGOIMA Request Details: LG2417
Date received: 21/01/2026
Requested information: Rating information for financial years 2024/25 and 2025/26
Status: Complete
Response:
Please find the information you requested below.
2024/025
2025/2026
LGOIMA Request Details: LG2418
Date received: 21/01/2026
Requested information: Information on staffing, third party payments and the Audit & Risk Committee
Status: Complete
Response:
The information you have requested is below;
1. Personnel as at 30 June 2025
- The total number of council staff dismissed due to poor performance in the financial year. None
- The total FTE number of staff employed by the council, excluding council-controlled organisations. 156.70 FTE
- If applicable, the FTE number of staff employed by CCOs. 5
- The total number of staff (non-FTE, including casual staff). If applicable, include CCOs separately. CCOs – 7.4
- The total number of staff including those
employed by CCOs receiving remuneration in excess of
$100,000.
55 MDC
1 CCO - The total number of staff including
those employed by CCOs receiving remuneration in excess of
$200,000.
4 MDC
Nil CCO - The total number of staff including those employed by council-controlled organisations receiving remuneration in excess of $256,800 (equivalent to a minister outside of Cabinet). Information withheld due to privacy (section 7(2)(a) protect the privacy of natural persons) due to the small number of employees in the group.
- The mean and median renumeration for Council
staff. MDC - Mean $90,400 Median
$83,636 (figures are based on total package)
The mean and median renumeration for CCO staff. N/A
2.1. Management
- The FTE number of managers employed by the council and, if applicable, the number of managers employed by CCOs as at 30 June 2025. 41.13 FTE Managers MDC
- The Taxpayers’ Union defines a manager as: any staff member who is responsible for a team of staff, or who has an employee/employees reporting to them and organises them to achieve their department’s or organisation’s specified goal. The Chief Executive team is included in this definition.
- The ratio of management to total staff numbers. If applicable, please provide a ratio for the group, including CCOs, and a ration for the council parent. 1 : 4.14 MDC
- The average and median salary of a manager. If applicable, please provide for both the group, including CCOs, and the council parent. Mean $136,810 Median $121,248 MDC
2.2. Communications
- The FTE number of communications &
marketing staff employed by the council and, if applicable, the number of
communications & marketing staff employed by CCOs.
3.55 MDC - The average
and median salary of communications & marketing staff. If
applicable, please provide for both the group, including CCOs, and the
council parent.
Information withheld under section 7(2)(a) of LGOIMA, to protect the privacy of natural persons, due to the small number of employees in the group.
3. Audit and Risk Oversight
- How many members are on the Council’s Audit and Risk Committee (or equivalent)? Seven.
- Of those members, how many are elected and how many are independent of the council? Five are elected and two are independent.
- Is the Chair of the Committee an independent member? Independent.
- Does the Council have a lawyer (with a current practising certificate) on the Committee? No. The Deputy Chair (independent) has a law degree and legal background, but not a practising certificate.
- Does the Council have an accountant (with a current practising certificate or a full member of the Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand) on the Committee? Yes. The Chair (independent) is registered with Chartered Accountants New Zealand.
- Does the Council have a code of conduct requiring political neutrality from Council staff? We have a policy for Council staff that addresses this area called the “Employees Expressing an Opinion About Council Policy”. It does not require staff to be politically neutral, however it prohibits the use of Council mediums or assets (Council’s social media, staff emails, facilities etc) for this purpose. Where staff wish to express an opinion that differs from the stated opinion of the Council, they are obligated to inform their manager and must qualify any such statements as being personal in nature (ergo not representative of the Council’s view).
4. Unelected members
- Please list
all appointments of unelected members onto council committees with
spending and regulatory powers. Finance and Performance: Stuart Campbell (chair), John Fowke (deputy
chair)
Water Services Delivery Unit Committee: Colin McFadzean (chair)
5. Payments to third parties
- The total payments made by the Council (or any council-controlled organisation) to any Chamber of Commerce, including GST. $6,118
- The total payments made by the Council (or any council-controlled organisation) to Local Government New Zealand (LGNZ), including GST. $65,113
- The total payments made by the Council (or any council-controlled organisation) to the Taituarā including GST. $52,905
LGOIMA Request Details: LG2419
Date received: 21/01/2026
Requested information: Information on Contractors and Consultants, depreciation and Mayors budget for 2024/25 financial year
Status: Complete
Response:
The information you have requested is below;
1. Contractors and consultants
- Total expenditure on contractors by the council and the FTE equivalent as at 30 June 2025. Please provide the same information for CCOs, if applicable.
- The Taxpayers’ Union defines contractors as per the Contractors and Consultants Guidance document published by the Public Service Commission.
Total Expenditure as at 30 June 2025 on contractors: $2,850,067
It is not possible for us to provide an accurate FTE equivalent
- Total expenditure on consultants by the council and the FTE equivalent as at 30 June 2025. Please provide the same information for CCOs, if applicable.
- The Taxpayers’ Union defines consultants as per the Contractors and Consultants Guidance document published by the Public Service Commission.
Total Expenditure as at 30 June 2025 on consultants:
$1,031,689 It is not possible for us to provide an accurate FTE equivalent
2. Mayor’s office
- If applicable, please provide the total
budget allocated to the mayor’s office for both
the financial year ended 30 June 2025 and the
current financial year.
Expenditure
2024/25 - $350,996
2025/26 - $372,356
- If applicable, please provide the FTE number
of staff employed to work in the mayor’s office and their job
titles.
1 – Executive Assistant to the Mayor
3. Depreciation and renewals – All figures are GST exclusive
- The total amount of depreciation funded for all council-owned assets in the year ended 30 June 2025, broken down by source (e.g., rates, grants, levies).
|
Funding Source |
Amount ($000) |
|
Rates |
$18,307 |
|
Capital Subsidy |
$8,752 |
|
Total |
$27,059 |
- The total cash amount spent on replacing, restoring, or upgrading existing assets to maintain levels of service in the year ended 30 June 2025.
$23,760,298
- What was the actual year-end balance of cash
reserves held for depreciation, and did the balance increase or decrease
over this period?
Council does not apportion cash balance to specific reserves.
- The total amount of depreciation funds allocated for purposes other than renewals capital expenditure in the year ended 30 June 2025. Specifically, detail the amounts used for: $3.6M of principle loan repayments for assets that are loan funded and Council funds depreciation for
- New Capital/Growth Projects (i.e., new assets,
not renewals).
New Capex - $18,274,000
Growth Capex - $6,929,000
- Debt Repayment (i.e., principal or interest
payments).
Interest on borrowings - $4,211,000
Principle Repayments - $3,607,780
- Operating Expenses.
Total Operating Expenditure - $49,509,000